Rogers v. Hughes

135 S.E. 496, 36 Ga. App. 90, 1926 Ga. App. LEXIS 778
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedNovember 9, 1926
Docket17528
StatusPublished

This text of 135 S.E. 496 (Rogers v. Hughes) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Rogers v. Hughes, 135 S.E. 496, 36 Ga. App. 90, 1926 Ga. App. LEXIS 778 (Ga. Ct. App. 1926).

Opinion

Broyles, C. J.

The evidence, while in acute conflict, authorized the verdict, and the grounds of the amendment to the motion for a new trial show no cause for another hearing of the case.

Judgment affirmed.

Luke, J., concurs. Bloodworth, J., absent on account of illness.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
135 S.E. 496, 36 Ga. App. 90, 1926 Ga. App. LEXIS 778, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rogers-v-hughes-gactapp-1926.