Rogers v. House

Texas Commission of Appeals

Rogers v. House

39 S.W.2d 1111

CourtTexas Commission of Appeals

DecidedJune 10, 1931

DocketNo. 1261—5654

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 39 S.W.2d 1111 (Rogers v. House) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Texas Commission of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Rogers v. House, 39 S.W.2d 1111 (Tex. Super. Ct. 1931).

Pincite

Opinion

BEDDY, J.

Both parties challenge the correctness of the disposition made of this case by the Court of Civil Appeals. 23 S.W.(2d) 414.

After a careful consideration of the questions submitted we have reached the conclusion that the case has been properly decided.

The original opinion and that rendered on rehearing by the Court of Civil Appeals contain a full and elaborate treatment of all the material questions now urged before us. Inasmuch as we find ourselves in full accord with the conclusions so ably expressed by that court and approve the reasoning supporting same, it is unnecessary that we engage in any discussion of the issues presented.

We therefore recommend that the judgment of the Court of Civil Appeals be affirmed.

CUBETON, C. J.

Judgment of the Court of Civil Appeals is affirmed, as recommended by the Commission of Appeals.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

BEDDY, J.

Both parties challenge the correctness of the disposition made of this case by the Court of Civil Appeals. 23 S.W.(2d) 414.

After a careful consideration of the questions submitted we have reached the conclusion that the case has been properly decided.

The original opinion and that rendered on rehearing by the Court of Civil Appeals contain a full and elaborate treatment of all the material questions now urged before us. Inasmuch as we find ourselves in full accord with the conclusions so ably expressed by that court and approve the reasoning supporting same, it is unnecessary that we engage in any discussion of the issues presented.

We therefore recommend that the judgment of the Court of Civil Appeals be affirmed.

CUBETON, C. J.

Judgment of the Court of Civil Appeals is affirmed, as recommended by the Commission of Appeals.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

39 S.W.2d 1111, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rogers-v-house-texcommnapp-1931.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack