Rogers v. Hoskins

14 Ga. 166
Supreme Court of Georgia·Decided August 15, 1853·No. No. 25·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

By the Court.

Lumpkin, J.

delivering the opinion.

[1.] A notice in the name of nobody, is no notice.

[2.] Both executors are joined in the notice. This was right. Both should have been served — they were not. This Was wrong.

Judgment reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Rogers v. Hoskins, 14 Ga. 166 (Ga. 1853).

14 Ga. 166 (Rogers v. Hoskins) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Buffalo Insurance v. Star Photo Finishing Co.
172 S.E.2d 159 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1969)
Lacik v. Colorado, T. & M. Ry. Co.
1909 OK 312 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1909)
Hathaway v. Marquette Circuit Judge
75 N.W. 761 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1898)
Loudon v. Coleman
59 Ga. 653 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1877)