Rogers v. Hitchcock

New York Supreme Court

Rogers v. Hitchcock

9 Wend. 462

DecidedFebruary 15, 1833

StatusPublished

This text of 9 Wend. 462 (Rogers v. Hitchcock) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Rogers v. Hitchcock, 9 Wend. 462 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1833).

Pincite

Opinion

Security for costs. The suit in this case was commenced by the wife whilst sole. The action is replevin. Since the commencement of the suit, she has married, and resides with her husband in Vermont. The defendant, on account of the non-residence of the plaintiffs, asks for security for costs, which is opposed, on the ground that the action is replevin> in which the defendant has already security in the replevin bond executed at the commencement of the suit; for which cause the motion was denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Security for costs. The suit in this case was commenced by the wife whilst sole. The action is replevin. Since the commencement of the suit, she has married, and resides with her husband in Vermont. The defendant, on account of the non-residence of the plaintiffs, asks for security for costs, which is opposed, on the ground that the action is replevin> in which the defendant has already security in the replevin bond executed at the commencement of the suit; for which cause the motion was denied.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

9 Wend. 462, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rogers-v-hitchcock-nysupct-1833.