Rogers v. Hines

Supreme Court of Alabama

Rogers v. Hines

86 So. 524, 204 Ala. 549

CourtSupreme Court of Alabama

DecidedJune 30, 1920

Docket3 Div. 468.

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 86 So. 524 (Rogers v. Hines) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Rogers v. Hines, 86 So. 524, 204 Ala. 549 (Ala. 1920).

Pincite

Opinion

THOMAS, J.

A trial had by the court without a jury, on oral evidence, resulted in a judgment for defendant.

The suit was by attachment to enforce a landlord’s lien, and the levy made on corn and other provender. We have carefully examined the record, and find thqt no error intervened on the trial. The evidence failed to show that the property levied upon was subject to a landlord’s lien.

Affirmed.

ANDERSON, C. J., and McCLELLAN and GARDNER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

THOMAS, J.

A trial had by the court without a jury, on oral evidence, resulted in a judgment for defendant.

The suit was by attachment to enforce a landlord’s lien, and the levy made on corn and other provender. We have carefully examined the record, and find thqt no error intervened on the trial. The evidence failed to show that the property levied upon was subject to a landlord’s lien.

Affirmed.

ANDERSON, C. J., and McCLELLAN and GARDNER, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

86 So. 524, 204 Ala. 549, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rogers-v-hines-ala-1920.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack