Rogers v. Hines

Supreme Court of Alabama

Rogers v. Hines

86 So. 524, 204 Ala. 549

Supreme Court of Alabama·Decided June 30, 1920·No. 3 Div. 468.·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

THOMAS, J.

A trial had by the court without a jury, on oral evidence, resulted in a judgment for defendant.

The suit was by attachment to enforce a landlord’s lien, and the levy made on corn and other provender. We have carefully examined the record, and find thqt no error intervened on the trial. The evidence failed to show that the property levied upon was subject to a landlord’s lien.

Affirmed.

ANDERSON, C. J., and McCLELLAN and GARDNER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

THOMAS, J.

A trial had by the court without a jury, on oral evidence, resulted in a judgment for defendant.

The suit was by attachment to enforce a landlord’s lien, and the levy made on corn and other provender. We have carefully examined the record, and find thqt no error intervened on the trial. The evidence failed to show that the property levied upon was subject to a landlord’s lien.

Affirmed.

ANDERSON, C. J., and McCLELLAN and GARDNER, JJ., concur.

Rogers v. Hines, 86 So. 524, 204 Ala. 549 (Ala. 1920).

Pincite

86 So. 524 (Rogers v. Hines) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related