Rogers v. Fitzpatrick

6 R.I. Dec. 186
CourtSuperior Court of Rhode Island
DecidedJune 14, 1930
DocketNo. 68195
StatusPublished

This text of 6 R.I. Dec. 186 (Rogers v. Fitzpatrick) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Superior Court of Rhode Island primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Rogers v. Fitzpatrick, 6 R.I. Dec. 186 (R.I. Ct. App. 1930).

Opinion

CARPENTER, J.

This is an action brought by the husband of the plain[187]*187tiff in case No. 66841 to recover for expenses sustained by bis wife in said case No. 66841, entitled Jessie V. Rogers vs. Walter E. Fitzpatrick, City Treasurer.

For plaintiff: Edward II. Ziegler, C. A. Kelley. For defendant: Elmer S. Chace, C. I. Munroe.

Tbe jury returned a verdict for tbe defendant and thereupon a motion for a new trial was filed and tbe case is now before tbis Court on said motion.

Tbe Court feels, as it bas set forth in tbe ease of Jessie V. Rogers vs. Walter E. Fitzpatrick, City Treasurer. that substantial justice bas been done, and tbe motion for a new trial is therefore denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
6 R.I. Dec. 186, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rogers-v-fitzpatrick-risuperct-1930.