Rogers v. Dockstader
135 P. 1185, 90 Kan. 863, 1913 Kan. LEXIS 319
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Rogers v. Dockstader. Read the opinion of the Court — 90 Kan. 189 →
Opinion
The plaintiff asks for a rehearing as to defendant Dockstader, suggesting that in the opinion (Rogers v. Dockstader, ante, p. 189, 133 Pac. 717) no affirmative error in the judgment against the latter was pointed out. Strictly speaking this is true, and considering the state of the record in this case, it will he left to the trial court to determine whether there is anything in the judgment against Dockstader inconsistent with the decision, and to act in.accordance with such determination.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Rogers v. Dockstader, 135 P. 1185, 90 Kan. 863, 1913 Kan. LEXIS 319 (kan 1913).
135 P. 1185 (Rogers v. Dockstader) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Rogers v. Dockstader
133 P. 717 (Supreme Court of Kansas, 1913)