Rogers v. Department of Children Youth and Families

District Court, W.D. Washington·Decided November 10, 2021·No. 3:21-cv-05248·Unknown

Opinion

The Honorable RICHARD A. JONES U.S. Magistrate Judge MICHELLE L. PETERSON

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

ACKERSON, and DAMIEN RIVERA et al., CASE NO. C21-5248-RAJ-MLP Plaintiffs, PROTECTIVE ORDER vs.

and FAMILIES (DCYF) et al., Defendants.

PURPOSES AND LIMITATIONS Discovery in this action involves the production of confidential, proprietary, or private information for which special protection may be warranted. Accordingly, the Parties together move the Court to enter the following Protective Order. This Protective Order is not intended to confer blanket protection on all disclosures or responses to discovery; rather, the protection it affords from public disclosure and use extends only to the limited information or items that are entitled to confidential treatment under the applicable legal principles, and they do not presumptively entitle parties to file confidential information under seal. 2. “CONFIDENTIAL” MATERIAL “Confidential” material shall include the following documents and tangible things produced or otherwise exchanged: A.) Dates of birth and names of minor children (LCR 5.2(a)(1-2)); B.) Social security numbers and taxpayer identification numbers (5 U.S.C. § 552a(b); LCR 5.2(a)(3)); C.) Personal information in files maintained for clients of public institutions or welfare recipients or records relating to commission of juvenile offenses (42 U.S.C. § 671(a)(8); Wash. Rev. Code § 13.50.050; Wash. Rev. Code § 42.56.230(1); Wash. Rev. Code § 74.04.060); D.) Health care information (Wash. Rev. Code § 70.02.010 (17)); E.) Records relating to mental illness and treatment (Wash. Rev. Code § 70.02.230; Wash. Rev. Code § 70.02.240); F.) Records relating to substance use disorder treatment (45 C.F.R. Part 2); G.) Credit card numbers, debit card numbers, electronic check numbers, card expiration dates, or bank or other financial account numbers (LCR 5.2(a)(4)); H.) Personal information about agency employees, appointees, or elected officials that would violate the right to privacy (Wash. Rev. Code § 42.56.230(3)); see, e.g., Brown v. Seattle Public Schools, 71 Wash. App. 613 (1993); I.) Documents containing information regarding the identity of persons making reports regarding child abuse or neglect, and all files, reports, records, communications, and working papers used or developed in the investigation or provision of protective services are subject to protection under state law (Wash. Rev. Code §§ 26.44.125(6), 13.50.100) and federal law (42 U.S.C. § 5106a(b)(2)(B)(viii-ix)); J.) Documents containing information regarding the identity of persons or families receiving child welfare services, and all files, reports, records, communications, and working papers used or developed in the investigation or provision of protective services are subject to protection under state law (Wash. Rev. Code § 13.50.100; Wash Rev. Code § 26.44.125(6)) and federal law (42 U.S.C. § 5106a(b)(2)(B)(viii-ix); 42 U.S.C. § 671(a)(8)); and K.) Records and documents, other than the official juvenile court files, related to juvenile offenses are subject to protection under state law. (Wash. Rev. Code § 13.50.050) 3. SCOPE The protections conferred by this Protective Order are not only for confidential material (as defined above), but also (1) any information copied or extracted from confidential material; (2) all copies, excerpts, summaries, or compilations of confidential material; and (3) any testimony, conversations, or presentations by parties or their counsel that might reveal confidential material. However, the protections conferred by this Protective Order do not cover information that is in the public domain or becomes part of the public domain through trial or otherwise. 4. ACCESS TO AND USE OF CONFIDENTIAL MATERIAL 4.1 Basic Principles. A receiving party may use confidential material that is disclosed or produced by another party or by a non-party in connection with this case only for prosecuting, defending, or attempting to settle this litigation. Confidential material may be disclosed only to the categories of persons and under the conditions described in this Protective Order. Confidential material must be stored and maintained by a receiving party at a location and in a secure manner that ensures that access is limited to the persons authorized under this Protective Order. 4.2 Protection of records of juvenile offenders. Notwithstanding any other provision of this protective order, records related to individuals incarcerated in a juvenile rehabilitation facility based on the adjudication of a juvenile offense produced to Plaintiffs’ counsel shall not be produced to, reviewed by, or shared with Plaintiffs unless Plaintiff is the subject of the records. 4.3 Disclosure of “CONFIDENTIAL” Information or Items. Unless authorized under RCW 70.02 or RCW 13.50 or otherwise ordered by the court or permitted in writing by the designating party, a receiving party may disclose any confidential material only to: (a) the receiving party’s next friends and counsel of record in this action, as well as employees of counsel to whom it is reasonably necessary to disclose the information for this litigation; (b) the officers, directors, and employees (including in-house counsel) of the receiving party to whom disclosure is reasonably necessary for this litigation, except as provided in paragraph 4.2 of this order, and unless the parties agree that a particular document or material produced is for Attorney’s Eyes Only and is so designated; (c) experts and consultants to whom disclosure is reasonably necessary for this litigation and who have signed the “Acknowledgment and Agreement to Be Bound” (Exhibit A); (d) the court, court personnel, and court reporters and their staff; (e) copy or imaging services retained by counsel to assist in the duplication of confidential material, provided that counsel for the party retaining the copy or imaging service instructs the service not to disclose any confidential material to third parties and to immediately return all originals and copies of any confidential material; (f) during their depositions, witnesses in the action to whom disclosure is reasonably necessary and who have signed the “Ackn

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Rogers v. Department of Children Youth and Families, (W.D. Wash. 2021).

Rogers v. Department of Children Youth and Families (Rogers v. Department of Children Youth and Families) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Brown v. Seattle Public Schools
860 P.2d 1059 (Court of Appeals of Washington, 1993)