Rogers v. Dayton

Ohio Supreme Court

Rogers v. Dayton

867 N.E.2d 843, 114 Ohio St. 3d 1408

CourtOhio Supreme Court

DecidedJune 6, 2007

Docket2007-0684

StatusPublished

This text of 867 N.E.2d 843 (Rogers v. Dayton) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Rogers v. Dayton, 867 N.E.2d 843, 114 Ohio St. 3d 1408 (Ohio 2007).

Pincite

Opinion

Montgomery App. No. 21593, 2007-Ohio-673. On review of order certifying a conflict. The court determines that a conflict exists. The parties are to brief the issue stated at page 6 of the court of appeals’ Decision and Entry filed April 11, 2007:

“Under R.C. 3937.18(K)(3)(2000), is a political subdivision ‘self-insured within the meaning of the financial responsibility law’ of Ohio if the political subdivision has not qualified as a self-insurer under R.C. Chapter 4509?”

Pfeifer, O’Donnell and Lanzinger, JJ., dissent.

The conflict case is Safe Auto Ins. Co. v. Corson, 155 Ohio App.3d 736, 2004-Ohio-249.

Sua sponte, cause consolidated with 2007-0549, Rogers u Dayton, Montgomery App. No. 21593, 2007-Ohio-673.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI