Rogers v. Cyrus

941 So. 2d 1196, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 18515, 2006 WL 3153972
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedNovember 6, 2006
DocketNo. 1D06-4394
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 941 So. 2d 1196 (Rogers v. Cyrus) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Rogers v. Cyrus, 941 So. 2d 1196, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 18515, 2006 WL 3153972 (Fla. Ct. App. 2006).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Upon consideration of the appellant’s response to the Court’s order of August 29, 2006, the Court has determined that the appeal is untimely. The appellant’s notice of appeal seeking review of the lower tribunal’s February 15, 2006, order was filed on August 11, 2006, well beyond the 30-day time period within which review must be sought. Fla. R.App. P. 9.110(b). Accordingly, the appeal is hereby dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. Any remedy available to the appellant lies with the lower tribunal rather than with this Court. Cf. Brown v. State, 708 So.2d 1041 (Fla. 1st DCA 1998).

ALLEN, BENTON, and HAWKES, JJ„ concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Buckman v. Beighley
128 So. 3d 133 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2013)
Wilson v. Stenotype Institute of Jacksonville, Inc.
55 So. 3d 710 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2011)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
941 So. 2d 1196, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 18515, 2006 WL 3153972, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rogers-v-cyrus-fladistctapp-2006.