Rogers v. Cromack
123 Mass. 582, 1878 Mass. LEXIS 206
Opinion
These exceptions are frivolous. The officer’s return in the former action did not estop him to prove, and [583] the court below has found the fact to be, that Rogers, the then defendant and now plaintiff, had no property in the piano. Denny v. Willard, 11 Pick. 519, 526. Roberts v. Wentworth, 5 Cush. 192. Exceptions overruled, with double costs.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Rogers v. Cromack, 123 Mass. 582, 1878 Mass. LEXIS 206 (Mass. 1878).
123 Mass. 582 (Rogers v. Cromack) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Young v. Riggs
185 N.E. 15 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1933)
Baker v. Seavey
40 N.E. 863 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1895)