Rogers v. Cromack
123 Mass. 582, 1878 Mass. LEXIS 206
This text of 123 Mass. 582 (Rogers v. Cromack) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Rogers v. Cromack, 123 Mass. 582, 1878 Mass. LEXIS 206 (Mass. 1878).
Opinion
These exceptions are frivolous. The officer’s return in the former action did not estop him to prove, and [583]*583the court below has found the fact to be, that Rogers, the then defendant and now plaintiff, had no property in the piano. Denny v. Willard, 11 Pick. 519, 526. Roberts v. Wentworth, 5 Cush. 192. Exceptions overruled, with double costs.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Young v. Riggs
185 N.E. 15 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1933)
Baker v. Seavey
40 N.E. 863 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1895)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
123 Mass. 582, 1878 Mass. LEXIS 206, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rogers-v-cromack-mass-1878.