Rogers v. Cornett

Missouri Court of Appeals

Rogers v. Cornett

509 S.W.3d 152, 2017 Mo. App. LEXIS 51, 2017 WL 401825

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided January 31, 2017·No. WD79577·Published

Opinion

ORDER

Per Curiam

The Circuit Court of Clay County entered judgment in favor of Respondent William Rogers in his unlawful detainer action against Appellant Michael Cornett. Cornett appeals. He argues that the judg[153] ment must be reversed, and the case remanded for a new trial, because the circuit court erroneously rejected his demand for a jury trial on the ground that it was untimely. We affirm. Because a published opinion would have no precedential value, an unpublished memorandum setting forth the reasons for this order has been provided to the parties. Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

Per Curiam

The Circuit Court of Clay County entered judgment in favor of Respondent William Rogers in his unlawful detainer action against Appellant Michael Cornett. Cornett appeals. He argues that the judg[153] ment must be reversed, and the case remanded for a new trial, because the circuit court erroneously rejected his demand for a jury trial on the ground that it was untimely. We affirm. Because a published opinion would have no precedential value, an unpublished memorandum setting forth the reasons for this order has been provided to the parties. Rule 84.16(b).

Rogers v. Cornett, 509 S.W.3d 152, 2017 Mo. App. LEXIS 51, 2017 WL 401825 (Mo. Ct. App. 2017).

Pincite

509 S.W.3d 152 (Rogers v. Cornett) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.