Rogers v. City of Rome
95 N.Y.S. 1157
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedOctober 11, 1905
StatusPublished
This text of 95 N.Y.S. 1157 (Rogers v. City of Rome) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Rogers v. City of Rome, 95 N.Y.S. 1157 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1905).
Opinion
Judgment and order reversed, and new trial ordered, with costs to the appelr lant to abide event, upon question of law only; the facts having been examined and no error found therein. Held, that the plaintiff failed to show actionable negligence on the part of the defendant. ■
SPRING and HISCOCK, JJ., dissent.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
95 N.Y.S. 1157, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rogers-v-city-of-rome-nyappdiv-1905.