Home/Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York/Rogers v. City of Rome

Rogers v. City of Rome

95 N.Y.S. 1157
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Rogers v. City of Rome. Read the opinion of the Court — 96 A.D. 427 →
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided October 11, 1905·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Judgment and order reversed, and new trial ordered, with costs to the appelr lant to abide event, upon question of law only; the facts having been examined and no error found therein. Held, that the plaintiff failed to show actionable negligence on the part of the defendant. ■

SPRING and HISCOCK, JJ., dissent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Rogers v. City of Rome, 95 N.Y.S. 1157 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1905).

95 N.Y.S. 1157 (Rogers v. City of Rome) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.