Rogers v. City of New York Department of Correction

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Rogers v. City of New York Department of Correction

193 A.D.2d 506, 597 N.Y.S.2d 371

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMay 18, 1993

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 193 A.D.2d 506 (Rogers v. City of New York Department of Correction) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Rogers v. City of New York Department of Correction, 193 A.D.2d 506, 597 N.Y.S.2d 371 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1993).

Pincite

Opinion

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Edward J. Greenfield, J.), entered February 25, 1992, which, in a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to annul respondents’ determination terminating petitioner as a correction officer, denied the application and dismissed the petition, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The IAS Court correctly held that petitioner, who agreed to be returned to probationary status in settlement of various disciplinary charges, including sick leave abuse, could be dismissed without a hearing, and that he failed to demonstrate that the decision to dismiss him because of further violations of sick leave regulations during the probationary period was made in bad faith (Matter of Soto v Koehler, 171 AD2d 567, 568, lv denied 78 NY2d 855). We have considered petitioner’s other contentions and find them to be without merit. Concur—Sullivan, J. P., Rosenberger, Wallach and Kupferman, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Edward J. Greenfield, J.), entered February 25, 1992, which, in a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to annul respondents’ determination terminating petitioner as a correction officer, denied the application and dismissed the petition, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The IAS Court correctly held that petitioner, who agreed to be returned to probationary status in settlement of various disciplinary charges, including sick leave abuse, could be dismissed without a hearing, and that he failed to demonstrate that the decision to dismiss him because of further violations of sick leave regulations during the probationary period was made in bad faith (Matter of Soto v Koehler, 171 AD2d 567, 568, lv denied 78 NY2d 855). We have considered petitioner’s other contentions and find them to be without merit. Concur—Sullivan, J. P., Rosenberger, Wallach and Kupferman, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

193 A.D.2d 506, 597 N.Y.S.2d 371, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rogers-v-city-of-new-york-department-of-correction-nyappdiv-1993.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack