Rogers v. City of Kansas City

Missouri Court of Appeals

Rogers v. City of Kansas City

511 S.W.3d 468, 2017 WL 765928, 2017 Mo. App. LEXIS 97

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedFebruary 28, 2017

DocketWD 79290

StatusPublished

This text of 511 S.W.3d 468 (Rogers v. City of Kansas City) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Rogers v. City of Kansas City, 511 S.W.3d 468, 2017 WL 765928, 2017 Mo. App. LEXIS 97 (Mo. Ct. App. 2017).

Pincite

Opinion

Order

Per Curiam:

Ms. Beverly Rogers appeals from the Judgment entered by the Circuit Court of Jackson County, Missouri, after a jury trial, in favor of the City of Kansas City, Missouri, Mr. Donald Finley, and Mr. Eugene Graves on Ms. Rogers’s petition for sexual discrimination, hostile work environment, and retaliation. Because a published opinion would have no precedential value, we have instead provided a separate memorandum of law to the parties. The Judgment is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order

Per Curiam:

Ms. Beverly Rogers appeals from the Judgment entered by the Circuit Court of Jackson County, Missouri, after a jury trial, in favor of the City of Kansas City, Missouri, Mr. Donald Finley, and Mr. Eugene Graves on Ms. Rogers’s petition for sexual discrimination, hostile work environment, and retaliation. Because a published opinion would have no precedential value, we have instead provided a separate memorandum of law to the parties. The Judgment is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

511 S.W.3d 468, 2017 WL 765928, 2017 Mo. App. LEXIS 97, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rogers-v-city-of-kansas-city-moctapp-2017.