Rogers v. City of Clearwater
74 So. 2d 87, 1954 Fla. LEXIS 1092
Opinion
Affirmed on authority of State v. City of Pensacola, Fla., 40 So.2d 569; Schmeller v. City of Fort Lauderdale, Fla., 38 So.2d 36; State v. City of Clearwater, 124 Fla. 354, 168 So. 546; State v. City of Coral Gables, Fla., 72 So.2d 48; State v. City of Jacksonville, 53 So.2d 306; and State v. City of Miami, Fla., 72 So.2d 655. The case of North Shore Bank v. Town of Surfside, Fla., 72 So.2d 659, is distinguishable in that it concerned an express legislative prohibition against the issuance of bonds in the manner there attempted.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Rogers v. City of Clearwater, 74 So. 2d 87, 1954 Fla. LEXIS 1092 (Fla. 1954).
74 So. 2d 87 (Rogers v. City of Clearwater) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
North Shore Bank v. Town of Surfside
72 So. 2d 659 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1954)
State v. City of Miami
72 So. 2d 655 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1954)
State v. City of Coral Gables
72 So. 2d 48 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1954)
State v. City of Jacksonville
53 So. 2d 306 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1951)
State v. City of Pensacola
40 So. 2d 569 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1949)
State v. City of Clearwater
168 So. 546 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1936)
Schmeller v. City of Fort Lauderdale
38 So. 2d 36 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1948)