Rogers v. Central of Georgia Ry. Co.

137 So. 454, 223 Ala. 547, 1931 Ala. LEXIS 546
Supreme Court of Alabama·Decided November 5, 1931·No. 4 Div. 605.·Published

Opinion

THOMAS, J.

The action of the plaintiff as to the counts for the destruction by fire of the blueberry bushes, and the ruling (and evidence relating thereto) was merely an amendment of the complaint striking out that claim, and was not within the statute for the taking of a nonsuit because of adverse ruling, and the ruling on evidence pertaining thereto is not now for consideration under said statute.

*548 The trial proceeded to judgment on the other counts.

The writ is therefore denied.

Writ denied.

ANDERSON, C. J.-, and BOULDIN and BROWN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Rogers v. Central of Georgia Ry. Co., 137 So. 454, 223 Ala. 547, 1931 Ala. LEXIS 546 (Ala. 1931).

137 So. 454 (Rogers v. Central of Georgia Ry. Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.