Rogers v. Central of Georgia Ry. Co.
This text of 137 So. 454 (Rogers v. Central of Georgia Ry. Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The action of the plaintiff as to the counts for the destruction by fire of the blueberry bushes, and the ruling (and evidence relating thereto) was merely an amendment of the complaint striking out that claim, and was not within the statute for the taking of a nonsuit because of adverse ruling, and the ruling on evidence pertaining thereto is not now for consideration under said statute.
*548 The trial proceeded to judgment on the other counts.
The writ is therefore denied.
Writ denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
137 So. 454, 223 Ala. 547, 1931 Ala. LEXIS 546, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rogers-v-central-of-georgia-ry-co-ala-1931.