Rogers v. Brinkley

231 F. App'x 280
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided June 29, 2007·No. No. 07-6477·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Hayward Leon Rogers appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny Rogers’ motion to remand the case and affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Rogers v. Brinkley, No. 8:06-cv-01278-MBS, 2007 WL 789929 (D.S.C. Mar.14, 2007). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Rogers v. Brinkley, 231 F. App'x 280 (4th Cir. 2007).

231 F. App'x 280 (Rogers v. Brinkley) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related