Rogers v. Brantley

94 S.E.2d 896, 244 N.C. 744, 1956 N.C. LEXIS 512
CourtSupreme Court of North Carolina
DecidedNovember 7, 1956
Docket471
StatusPublished
Cited by6 cases

This text of 94 S.E.2d 896 (Rogers v. Brantley) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Rogers v. Brantley, 94 S.E.2d 896, 244 N.C. 744, 1956 N.C. LEXIS 512 (N.C. 1956).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

It being made to appear to this Court in connection with motion suggesting diminution of record that this special proceeding is still pending in the Superior Court, and that no final judgment has been entered, this Court holds ex mero motu that the appeals are fragmentary and premature, and, therefore, must be dismissed, — and it is so ordered, preserving, nevertheless, exceptions of the respective parties to the said orders, staying execution of the orders, and holding in statu quo sufficient funds in the hands of the Clerk of Superior Court for compliance with said orders, if eventually approved, all pending final determination of the proceeding.

Appeal dismissed.

Johnson, J., not sitting.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Estate of Mills v. Estate of Mills
Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 2014
Ingle v. Ingle
Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 2014
Mills v. Moore
291 S.E.2d 141 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1982)
BLUE RIDGE SPORTCYCLE CO., INC. v. Schroader
280 S.E.2d 799 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 1981)
Bailey v. Gooding
270 S.E.2d 431 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1980)
Waters v. Qualified Personnel, Inc.
240 S.E.2d 338 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1978)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
94 S.E.2d 896, 244 N.C. 744, 1956 N.C. LEXIS 512, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rogers-v-brantley-nc-1956.