Rogers v. Brantley

94 S.E.2d 896, 244 N.C. 744, 1956 N.C. LEXIS 512
Supreme Court of North Carolina·Decided November 7, 1956·No. 471·Published·Cited by 6 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

It being made to appear to this Court in connection with motion suggesting diminution of record that this special proceeding is still pending in the Superior Court, and that no final judgment has been entered, this Court holds ex mero motu that the appeals are fragmentary and premature, and, therefore, must be dismissed, — and it is so ordered, preserving, nevertheless, exceptions of the respective parties to the said orders, staying execution of the orders, and holding in statu quo sufficient funds in the hands of the Clerk of Superior Court for compliance with said orders, if eventually approved, all pending final determination of the proceeding.

Appeal dismissed.

Johnson, J., not sitting.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Rogers v. Brantley, 94 S.E.2d 896, 244 N.C. 744, 1956 N.C. LEXIS 512 (N.C. 1956).

94 S.E.2d 896 (Rogers v. Brantley) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Estate of Mills v. Estate of Mills
Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 2014
Ingle v. Ingle
Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 2014
Mills v. Moore
291 S.E.2d 141 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1982)
BLUE RIDGE SPORTCYCLE CO., INC. v. Schroader
280 S.E.2d 799 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 1981)
Bailey v. Gooding
270 S.E.2d 431 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1980)
Waters v. Qualified Personnel, Inc.
240 S.E.2d 338 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1978)