Rogers v. Brand

Supreme Court of Georgia

Rogers v. Brand

66 S.E. 1095, 133 Ga. 759, 1910 Ga. LEXIS 53

CourtSupreme Court of Georgia

DecidedJanuary 14, 1910

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 66 S.E. 1095 (Rogers v. Brand) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Rogers v. Brand, 66 S.E. 1095, 133 Ga. 759, 1910 Ga. LEXIS 53 (Ga. 1910).

Pincite

Opinion

Pee Curiam.

This ease came before this court upon a writ of error; and the same being'for decision by a full bench of six Justices, who are evenly divided in opinion, Chief Justice Fish, Presiding Justice Evans, and Justice Lumpkin being in favor of a reversal, and Justices Beck, Atkinson, and Holden being in favor of affirmance, it is considered and adjudged that the judgment of the court below stand affirmed by operation of law.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Pee Curiam.

This ease came before this court upon a writ of error; and the same being'for decision by a full bench of six Justices, who are evenly divided in opinion, Chief Justice Fish, Presiding Justice Evans, and Justice Lumpkin being in favor of a reversal, and Justices Beck, Atkinson, and Holden being in favor of affirmance, it is considered and adjudged that the judgment of the court below stand affirmed by operation of law.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

66 S.E. 1095, 133 Ga. 759, 1910 Ga. LEXIS 53, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rogers-v-brand-ga-1910.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack