Rogers v. Brand
66 S.E. 1095, 133 Ga. 759, 1910 Ga. LEXIS 53
Opinion
This ease came before this court upon a writ of error; and the same being'for decision by a full bench of six Justices, who are evenly divided in opinion, Chief Justice Fish, Presiding Justice Evans, and Justice Lumpkin being in favor of a reversal, and Justices Beck, Atkinson, and Holden being in favor of affirmance, it is considered and adjudged that the judgment of the court below stand affirmed by operation of law.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Rogers v. Brand, 66 S.E. 1095, 133 Ga. 759, 1910 Ga. LEXIS 53 (Ga. 1910).
66 S.E. 1095 (Rogers v. Brand) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Pure Oil Co. v. Sturm
182 N.E. 875 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 1930)
Davis v. First National Bank
78 S.E. 190 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1913)