Rogers v. Bradford

29 Ala. 474
CourtSupreme Court of Alabama
DecidedJune 15, 1856
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 29 Ala. 474 (Rogers v. Bradford) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Rogers v. Bradford, 29 Ala. 474 (Ala. 1856).

Opinion

RICE, C. J.

In Moore v. Barclay, 23 Ala. 739, it was decided, that when the answer to a bill to enjoin the collection of a judgment or execution at law “has. so far denied the allegations of the bill,.as to leave it without equity as respects the remaining facts not denied by the answer,” there is no error in dissolving the injunction on the answer. To that decision we adhere •; and upon its authority we affirm the decree in this case, at the costs of the appellant.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Scott v. Boyd
101 So. 424 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1924)
Hall v. Atlanta, B. & A. R. R. Co.
48 So. 365 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1908)
Thomas v. Rowe
22 S.E. 157 (Supreme Court of Virginia, 1895)
Rice & Wilson v. Tobias
83 Ala. 348 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1887)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
29 Ala. 474, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rogers-v-bradford-ala-1856.