Rogers v. Bradford
29 Ala. 474
Opinion
In Moore v. Barclay, 23 Ala. 739, it was decided, that when the answer to a bill to enjoin the collection of a judgment or execution at law “has. so far denied the allegations of the bill,.as to leave it without equity as respects the remaining facts not denied by the answer,” there is no error in dissolving the injunction on the answer. To that decision we adhere •; and upon its authority we affirm the decree in this case, at the costs of the appellant.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Rogers v. Bradford, 29 Ala. 474 (Ala. 1856).
29 Ala. 474 (Rogers v. Bradford) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Scott v. Boyd
101 So. 424 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1924)
Hall v. Atlanta, B. & A. R. R. Co.
48 So. 365 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1908)
Thomas v. Rowe
22 S.E. 157 (Supreme Court of Virginia, 1895)
Rice & Wilson v. Tobias
83 Ala. 348 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1887)