Rogers v. Bomer

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Rogers v. Bomer

1920 OK 103, 186 P. 205, 77 Okla. 285, 1920 Okla. LEXIS 258

CourtSupreme Court of Oklahoma

DecidedMarch 9, 1920

Docket9653

StatusPublished

Cited by8 cases

This text of 1920 OK 103 (Rogers v. Bomer) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Rogers v. Bomer, 1920 OK 103, 186 P. 205, 77 Okla. 285, 1920 Okla. LEXIS 258 (Okla. 1920).

Pincite

Opinion

RAINEY, J.

On January 13, 1920, an order was entered, giving plaintiff in error 30 days from that date in which to file brief, and the cause was thereafter submitted on February 10, 1920. No brief having been filed within the extension of time granted, the cause is dismissed for want of prosecution. Balch v. Pickard. 72 Oklahoma, 179 Pac. 10; McGowen et al. v. Keller Ring, 77 Oklahoma.

OWEN, C. J., and PITCHFORD, JOHNSON, HIGGINS, and BAILEY, J.J., concur

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

RAINEY, J.

On January 13, 1920, an order was entered, giving plaintiff in error 30 days from that date in which to file brief, and the cause was thereafter submitted on February 10, 1920. No brief having been filed within the extension of time granted, the cause is dismissed for want of prosecution. Balch v. Pickard. 72 Oklahoma, 179 Pac. 10; McGowen et al. v. Keller Ring, 77 Oklahoma.

OWEN, C. J., and PITCHFORD, JOHNSON, HIGGINS, and BAILEY, J.J., concur

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1920 OK 103, 186 P. 205, 77 Okla. 285, 1920 Okla. LEXIS 258, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rogers-v-bomer-okla-1920.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack