Rogers v. Bell Atlantic-VA

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 00-1435

RANDALL STEVEN ROGERS, Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

BELL ATLANTIC-VIRGINIA, INCORPORATED, Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Leonie M. Brinkema, District Judge. (CA-99-1445-A)

Submitted: September 26, 2000 Decided: October 11, 2000

Before NIEMEYER, MICHAEL, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Karen Rapaport Esser, David James Shaffer, Mary Margaret Utterback, THELEN, REID & PRIEST, L.L.P., Washington, D.C., for Appellant. Randall Steven Rogers, Appellee Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM:

Bell Atlantic—Virginia, Inc., appeals the district court’s order denying its motion to dismiss Randall Steven Rogers’ com- plaint alleging a violation of the Americans with Disabilities Act. See 28 U.S.C. § 1292(b) (1994). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s reasoning stated in open court and find no re- versible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Rogers v. Bell Atlantic—Virginia, Inc., No. CA-99-1445-A (E.D. Va. Mar. 14, 2000); see also Puryear v. County of Roanoke, 214 F.3d 514 (4th Cir. 2000). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED