Rogers v. Bartley

107 So. 2d 786
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided January 8, 1959·No. No. A-289·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from a judgment of the Circuit Court for Duval County, based upon a jury verdict, in favor of the plaintiff-appellee on his claim that the deceased contracted to provide for him in his will but failed to do so. The proper rule to be applied in such a case is that the proof of such contract must be clear, cogent, and convincing, and the making of such contract must be established by -disinterested witnesses. First Atlantic 'Na[787] tional Bank of Daytona Beach v. Cobbett, Fla., 82 So.2d 870. Traurig v. Spear, Fla. App., 102 So.2d 165. We think that the evidence at the trial measured up to this standard and so, no error appearing in the record, the judgment should be, and it is, affirmed.

Affirmed.

STURGIS, C. J., and CARROLL, DONALD, and WIGGINTON, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Rogers v. Bartley, 107 So. 2d 786 (Fla. Ct. App. 1959).

107 So. 2d 786 (Rogers v. Bartley) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Hagan v. Laragione
205 So. 2d 289 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1967)
Laragione v. Hagan
195 So. 2d 246 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1967)
Keith v. Culp
111 So. 2d 278 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1959)