Rogers v. . Banzet
165 S.E. 358, 203 N.C. 217, 1932 N.C. LEXIS 354
Opinion
The purpose of the action is to impress a resulting trust upon certain property and to recover an amount alleged to be due the plaintiff. The appellants demurred to the complaint on the ground that it does not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action, since it states a loan but does not set forth a trust upon the land or its proceeds. The court overruled the demurrer.
The allegations in the complaint, which the appellants admit by filing the demurrer, precludes dismissal of the action. Judgment
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Rogers v. . Banzet, 165 S.E. 358, 203 N.C. 217, 1932 N.C. LEXIS 354 (N.C. 1932).
165 S.E. 358 (Rogers v. . Banzet) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Mills v. Moore
219 N.C. 25 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1941)