Rogers v. B. & B. Oil Co.
This text of 302 S.W.2d 608 (Rogers v. B. & B. Oil Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Kentucky primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Motion for an appeal from a judgment of the Estill Circuit Court, Honorable S. H. Rice, Judge, for $202 in an action for claim and delivery of oil-well equipment and a dismissal of a counterclaim for judgment that the plaintiff did not have an oil lease on the defendant’s property. The amount involved in the claim of forfeiture or abandonment of the lease is not disclosed in the record.
We are of opinion that the judgment is correct.
The motion for an appeal is overruled and the judgment stands affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
302 S.W.2d 608, 1957 Ky. LEXIS 205, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rogers-v-b-b-oil-co-kyctapp-1957.