Rogers v. . American Tobacco Company
This text of 178 S.E. 226 (Rogers v. . American Tobacco Company) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
There is no evidence in the record tending to show a breach by the defendant Y. B. Lougee, Jr., of any duty which he owed to the plaintiff as superintendent of his codefendant, American Tobacco Company. For that reason there was error in the refusal of the trial court to allow the motion of said defendant, at the close of all the evidence, that the action be dismissed as to him. The judgment against the defendant Y. B. Lougee, Jr., is reversed.
There was evidence at the trial tending to show that the plaintiff was injured by the negligence of the defendant American Tobacco Company. See Ross v. Cotton Mills, 140 N. C., 115, 52 S. E., 121. This evidence, together with the conflicting evidence with respect to the contributory negligence of the plaintiff, was properly submitted to the jury. There was no error in the refusal of the trial court to allow the motion of the defendant American Tobacco Company at the close of all the evidence that the action be dismissed as to said defendant. The judgment against the defendant American Tobacco Company is affirmed.
Reversed in appeal of defendant Y. B. Lougee, Jr.
No error in appeal of defendant American Tobacco Company.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
178 S.E. 226, 207 N.C. 865, 1935 N.C. LEXIS 288, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rogers-v-american-tobacco-company-nc-1935.