Rogers v. Alemite Corp.

Third Circuit

Rogers v. Alemite Corp.

74 F.2d 1019, 24 U.S.P.Q. (BNA) 3, 1934 U.S. App. LEXIS 4029

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit

DecidedDecember 18, 1934

DocketNo. 5463

StatusPublished

This text of 74 F.2d 1019 (Rogers v. Alemite Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Rogers v. Alemite Corp., 74 F.2d 1019, 24 U.S.P.Q. (BNA) 3, 1934 U.S. App. LEXIS 4029 (3d Cir. 1934).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

In this case, infringement, by the defendants, of certain claims of patent No. 1,307,-734, granted to Gullborg, was charged. On final hearing, the court held the patent valid and infringed.

The mechanism of the patent involved is described at length in Bassick Mfg. Co. v. Adams Grease Gun Corporation (C. C. A.) 52 F.(2d) 36, and reference thereto saves needless repetition. The questions involved in the present case were discussed by the court below in its opinion, and, as no new principle of patent law is involved and we find no error in that court’s view, we limit ourselves to affirming the case on the opinion of the trial judge (Alemite Corporation v. Rogers, 5 F. Supp. 940).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

In this case, infringement, by the defendants, of certain claims of patent No. 1,307,-734, granted to Gullborg, was charged. On final hearing, the court held the patent valid and infringed.

The mechanism of the patent involved is described at length in Bassick Mfg. Co. v. Adams Grease Gun Corporation (C. C. A.) 52 F.(2d) 36, and reference thereto saves needless repetition. The questions involved in the present case were discussed by the court below in its opinion, and, as no new principle of patent law is involved and we find no error in that court’s view, we limit ourselves to affirming the case on the opinion of the trial judge (Alemite Corporation v. Rogers, 5 F. Supp. 940).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

74 F.2d 1019, 24 U.S.P.Q. (BNA) 3, 1934 U.S. App. LEXIS 4029, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rogers-v-alemite-corp-ca3-1934.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack