Rogers, Thomas Hugh
This text of Rogers, Thomas Hugh (Rogers, Thomas Hugh) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS NO. WR-91,918-01
EX PARTE THOMAS HUGH ROGERS, Applicant
ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS CAUSE NO. 10030A IN THE 29TH DISTRICT COURT FROM PALO PINTO COUNTY
Per curiam.
ORDER
Applicant was convicted of forgery by passing and sentenced to twenty-five years’
imprisonment. Applicant did not file a direct appeal. Applicant filed this application for a writ of
habeas corpus in the county of conviction, and the district clerk forwarded it to this Court. See TEX .
CODE CRIM . PROC. art. 11.07.
Applicant contends that he was denied time credit while released on parole. Applicant has
alleged facts that, if true, might entitle him to relief. TEX . GOV ’T CODE § 508.283(b) and (c); Ex
parte Spann, 132 S.W.3d 390 (Tex. Crim. App. 2004). Accordingly, the record should be
developed. The trial court is the appropriate forum for findings of fact. TEX . CODE CRIM . PROC.
art. 11.07, § 3(d). The trial court shall order the Texas Department of Criminal Justice’s Office of 2
the General Counsel to obtain a response from a person with knowledge of relevant facts. In
developing the record, the trial court may use any means set out in Article 11.07, § 3(d). If the trial
court elects to hold a hearing, it shall determine whether Applicant is indigent. If Applicant is
indigent and wants to be represented by counsel, the trial court shall appoint counsel to represent him
at the hearing. See TEX . CODE CRIM . PROC. art. 26.04. If counsel is appointed or retained, the trial
court shall immediately notify this Court of counsel’s name.
The response shall state whether Applicant presented a claim to the time credit resolution
system of the Texas Department of Criminal Justice and, if so, the date the claim was presented. The
response shall then state whether Applicant was serving a sentence for, or has been previously
convicted of, an offense described by § 508.149(a) of the Texas Government Code when parole was
revoked. If not, the response shall state the following:
(1) Applicant’s sentence-begin date, (2) how much time was remaining on Applicant’s sentence when he was released, (3) how much time Applicant spent on parole before any revocation warrants were issued, (4) the dates any revocation warrants were issued and executed, and (5) whether Applicant received credit while released on parole.
The trial court shall make findings of fact and conclusions of law as to whether, before filing
this application, Applicant properly exhausted administrative remedies as required by § 501.0081(b)
of the Government Code. The trial court shall then determine whether Applicant is eligible to earn
street time credit and, if so, whether he is receiving the proper credit for that time. The trial court
may make any other findings and conclusions that it deems appropriate in response to Applicant’s
claim.
The trial court shall make findings of fact and conclusions of law within ninety days from 3
the date of this order. The district clerk shall then immediately forward to this Court the trial court’s
findings and conclusions and the record developed on remand, including, among other things,
affidavits, motions, objections, proposed findings and conclusions, orders, and transcripts from
hearings and depositions. See TEX . R. APP . P. 73.4(b)(4). Any extensions of time must be requested
by the trial court and obtained from this Court.
Filed: November 18, 2020 Do not publish
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Rogers, Thomas Hugh, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rogers-thomas-hugh-texcrimapp-2020.