Rogers & Gracie v. Chapman
7 Cow. 475
This text of 7 Cow. 475 (Rogers & Gracie v. Chapman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Rogers & Gracie v. Chapman, 7 Cow. 475 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1827).
Opinion
That is true of a case where it is apparent that nominal damages, alone would be given. But the proceedings in this case were unusually severe; and the defendant may satisfy a jury that they were dictated either by the assignee or some agent. The deputy makes no affidavit explanatory of Ms conduct. We think the defendant should be left to his remedy by action.
Motion granted.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
7 Cow. 475, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rogers-gracie-v-chapman-nysupct-1827.