Rogers (Cornelius) Vs. State
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
CORNELIUS EUGENE ROGERS, No. 81712 Appellant,
vs.
THE STATE OF NEVADA,
FILED
Respondent.
OCT 0 2 2020 ELIZABETH A. BROWN CLERK OF SUPREME COURT
DEPUCT1
4-1'.tarite
ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL
This is a pro se notice of appeal from "the decision of the District Court and The Court of Appeals of Nevada The Order of Affirmance." Eighth Judicial District Court, Clark County; Carolyn Ellsworth, Judge.
This court's review of this appeal reveals jurisdictional defects.
First, the order denying a motion to correct an illegal sentence entered on January 10, 2020, was already appealed in Docket No. 79814. A second duplicate appeal may not be pursued. Second, no statute or court rule permits an appeal frorn an order of affirmance of the Court of Appeals. See NRAP 40B(a) (A decision of the Court of Appeals is a final decision that is not reviewable by the Supreme Court except on petition for review."), Castillo v. State, 106 Nev. 349, 792 P.2d 1133 (1990). Accordingly, this court ORDERS this appeal DISMISSED.
-4.S:21"A
Parraguirre
IA4A.eac Hardesty Cadish SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA
01 1947A 014pleo .10 -3(04259 cc: Hon. Carolyn Ellsworth, District Judge Cornelius Eugene Rogers Attorney General/Carson City Clark County District Attorney Eighth District Court Clerk
SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA
IO I947A 2
A
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
472 P.3d 1208 (Rogers (Cornelius) Vs. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.