Rogerio Estrada, Jr., Individually and D/B/A Quick Auto Service v. Safe T EQ, LLC

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedSeptember 2, 2021
Docket04-21-00364-CV
StatusPublished

This text of Rogerio Estrada, Jr., Individually and D/B/A Quick Auto Service v. Safe T EQ, LLC (Rogerio Estrada, Jr., Individually and D/B/A Quick Auto Service v. Safe T EQ, LLC) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Rogerio Estrada, Jr., Individually and D/B/A Quick Auto Service v. Safe T EQ, LLC, (Tex. Ct. App. 2021).

Opinion

Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas September 2, 2021

No. 04-21-00364-CV

Rogerio ESTRADA, Jr., Individually and d/b/a Quick Auto Service, Appellant

v.

SAFE T EQ, LLC, Appellee

From the 381st Judicial District Court, Starr County, Texas Trial Court No. DC-20-465 Honorable Jose Luis Garza, Judge Presiding

ORDER Sitting: Rebeca C. Martinez, Chief Justice Liza A. Rodriguez, Justice Lori I. Valenzuela, Justice

On August 27, 2021, Appellant Rogerio Estrada, Individually and d/b/a Quick Auto Service, filed a notice of restricted appeal, seeking review of a default judgment against him. On August 31, 2021, Estrada filed a Motion for Immediate Temporary Relief to Stay All Proceedings. Specifically, Estrada seeks a stay of any attempt to execute the judgment pending appeal. In his motion, Estrada makes arguments regarding the merits of his restricted appeal; however, he fails to show why he is entitled to an emergency stay of all proceedings pending appeal, including why he cannot supersede the judgment in accordance with the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure. See TEX. R. APP. P. 24 (Suspension of Enforcement of Judgment Pending Appeal in Civil Cases); see also 5 MCDONALD & CARLSON, TEX. CIV. PRAC. § 30:15) (Dec. 2020 Update) (explaining that “review of final judgments by a restricted appeal to the court of appeals . . . qualify as an appeal” for purposes of superseding the final judgment). Appellant’s motion is DENIED.

_________________________________ Liza A. Rodriguez, Justice IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said court on this 2nd day of September, 2021.

___________________________________ MICHAEL A. CRUZ, Clerk of Court

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Rogerio Estrada, Jr., Individually and D/B/A Quick Auto Service v. Safe T EQ, LLC, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rogerio-estrada-jr-individually-and-dba-quick-auto-service-v-safe-t-texapp-2021.