Roger Williams v. United States

Fifth Circuit

Roger Williams v. United States

338 F.2d 990, 1964 U.S. App. LEXIS 3620

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

DecidedDecember 10, 1964

Docket21514

StatusPublished

This text of 338 F.2d 990 (Roger Williams v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Roger Williams v. United States, 338 F.2d 990, 1964 U.S. App. LEXIS 3620 (5th Cir. 1964).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellant complains of the action of the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas in denying his motion to vacate sentence pursuant to Title 28 U.S.C. § 2255. The district judge wrote a careful and thoughtful opinion disposing of appellant’s claims of error, 235 F.Supp. 215. We approve and concur in that opinion. See also our opinion on appellant’s prior application, Williams v. United States, 311 F.2d 68 (5th Cir. 1962).

The judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Appellant complains of the action of the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas in denying his motion to vacate sentence pursuant to Title 28 U.S.C. § 2255. The district judge wrote a careful and thoughtful opinion disposing of appellant’s claims of error, 235 F.Supp. 215. We approve and concur in that opinion. See also our opinion on appellant’s prior application, Williams v. United States, 311 F.2d 68 (5th Cir. 1962).

The judgment is affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

338 F.2d 990, 1964 U.S. App. LEXIS 3620, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/roger-williams-v-united-states-ca5-1964.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack