Roger W. Lane v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Roger W. Lane v. State

DecidedApril 30, 2021

DocketA21A1290

StatusPublished

This text of Roger W. Lane v. State (Roger W. Lane v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Roger W. Lane v. State, (Ga. Ct. App. 2021).

Pincite

Opinion

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,____________________ April 26, 2021

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A21A1290. ROGER W. LANE v. THE STATE.

In 1999, Roger W. Lane was convicted of aggravated child molestation and child molestation, and the trial court sentenced him to 20 years with 10 years to serve and 10 years on probation. In 2014, the State Probation Officer filed a petition to revoke his probation due to technical violations. On January 27, 2015, the trial court granted the petition and revoked twelve months of Lane’s probation. On February 19, 2015, Lane filed a notice of appeal. More than six years later, on April 5, 2021, this appeal was docketed in our Court.1 We, however, lack jurisdiction. To pursue an appeal from an order revoking probation, a defendant must file an application for discretionary review. See OCGA § 5-6-35 (a) (5), (b); White v. State, 233 Ga. App. 873, 874 (505 SE2d 228) (1998). The discretionary application must be filed within 30 days of the entry of the order at issue. See OCGA § 5-6-35 (d). Compliance with these statutory procedures is an absolute requirement to confer jurisdiction in this Court. See Gable v. State, 290 Ga. 81, 82 (2) (a) (720 SE2d 170) (2011); Smoak v. Dept. of Human Resources, 221 Ga. App. 257, 257 (471 SE2d 60)

1 The delay in transmitting the appeal to this Court apparently was caused by Lane’s failure to pay costs. Although Lane sought to proceed in forma pauperis, his “Affidavit of Poverty” was legally insufficient because it was not notarized. See Anderson v. Hardoman, 286 Ga. App. 499, 500-501(1) (649 SE2d 611) (2007) (affidavit of indigency under OCGA § 9-15-2 was invalid because it was not notarized as required). The trial court dismissed the affidavit. Lane subsequently paid the cost bill, and this appeal was transmitted. (1996). Because Lane has not followed the mandatory appeal procedures, this appeal is hereby DISMISSED.

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________ 04/26/2021 I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia. Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,____________________ April 26, 2021

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A21A1290. ROGER W. LANE v. THE STATE.

In 1999, Roger W. Lane was convicted of aggravated child molestation and child molestation, and the trial court sentenced him to 20 years with 10 years to serve and 10 years on probation. In 2014, the State Probation Officer filed a petition to revoke his probation due to technical violations. On January 27, 2015, the trial court granted the petition and revoked twelve months of Lane’s probation. On February 19, 2015, Lane filed a notice of appeal. More than six years later, on April 5, 2021, this appeal was docketed in our Court.1 We, however, lack jurisdiction. To pursue an appeal from an order revoking probation, a defendant must file an application for discretionary review. See OCGA § 5-6-35 (a) (5), (b); White v. State, 233 Ga. App. 873, 874 (505 SE2d 228) (1998). The discretionary application must be filed within 30 days of the entry of the order at issue. See OCGA § 5-6-35 (d). Compliance with these statutory procedures is an absolute requirement to confer jurisdiction in this Court. See Gable v. State, 290 Ga. 81, 82 (2) (a) (720 SE2d 170) (2011); Smoak v. Dept. of Human Resources, 221 Ga. App. 257, 257 (471 SE2d 60)

1 The delay in transmitting the appeal to this Court apparently was caused by Lane’s failure to pay costs. Although Lane sought to proceed in forma pauperis, his “Affidavit of Poverty” was legally insufficient because it was not notarized. See Anderson v. Hardoman, 286 Ga. App. 499, 500-501(1) (649 SE2d 611) (2007) (affidavit of indigency under OCGA § 9-15-2 was invalid because it was not notarized as required). The trial court dismissed the affidavit. Lane subsequently paid the cost bill, and this appeal was transmitted. (1996). Because Lane has not followed the mandatory appeal procedures, this appeal is hereby DISMISSED.

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________ 04/26/2021 I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia. Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

Roger W. Lane v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/roger-w-lane-v-state-gactapp-2021.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack