Roger v. State
749 So. 2d 1275, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 1373, 2000 WL 159137
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided February 16, 2000·No. No. 3D99-857·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
There is no merit in any of the claims of trial or sentencing error suggested by counsel or raised by the appellant individually. Any reliance on Thompson v. State, 750 So.2d 643 (Fla.1999), which held the Gort Act, under which Roger was sentenced, unconstitutional, is unavailing because his offense was committed on April 17, 1998, after the legislature “revalidated” the statute. Lee v. State, 739 So.2d 1175 (Fla. 3d DCA 1999).
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Roger v. State, 749 So. 2d 1275, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 1373, 2000 WL 159137 (Fla. Ct. App. 2000).
749 So. 2d 1275 (Roger v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Brown v. State
756 So. 2d 230 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2000)