Roger v. Cancienne

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Roger v. Cancienne

521 So. 2d 1140, 1988 La. LEXIS 760, 1988 WL 22763

Supreme Court of Louisiana·Decided March 18, 1988·No. No. 88-CC-0383·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

In re Roger, Deborah; Roger, Robert Sr.; Roger, Robert Jr.; Roger Dana; ap[1141] plying for writ of certiorari and/or review, supervisory writ; to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, No. CW-8985; Parish of St. Bernard, 34th Judicial District Court, Div. “C”, No. 51225.

Granted. The Court of Appeal’s judgment is amended to permit the applicant to move for a judgment NOV in the trial court. Otherwise the application is denied.

LEMMON, J., would grant the writ and docket for argument.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re Roger, Deborah; Roger, Robert Sr.; Roger, Robert Jr.; Roger Dana; ap[1141] plying for writ of certiorari and/or review, supervisory writ; to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, No. CW-8985; Parish of St. Bernard, 34th Judicial District Court, Div. “C”, No. 51225.

Granted. The Court of Appeal’s judgment is amended to permit the applicant to move for a judgment NOV in the trial court. Otherwise the application is denied.

LEMMON, J., would grant the writ and docket for argument.

Roger v. Cancienne, 521 So. 2d 1140, 1988 La. LEXIS 760, 1988 WL 22763 (La. 1988).

Pincite

521 So. 2d 1140 (Roger v. Cancienne) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related