Roger Smith v. State
This text of 188 So. 3d 911 (Roger Smith v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
AFFIRMED. See Young v. State, 141 So.3d 161, 165 (Fla.2013) (holding sufficiency of the evidence claim was not reviewable for fundamental error on appeal where defendant waived appellate review on- the specific issue of whether an uninhabitable building that had been undergoing renovation at the time of the break-in constituted a “dwelling” under the burglary statute, because defendant did not specifically argue at trial that the building was not a “dwelling” and the evidence established that, at the very least, defendant committed a burglary of a structure).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
188 So. 3d 911, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 6513, 2016 WL 1573882, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/roger-smith-v-state-fladistctapp-2016.