Roger Scott v. Charles Ryan

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Roger Scott v. Charles Ryan. Read the opinion of the Court — 686 F.3d 1130
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided January 23, 2013·No. 11-99002·Published

Opinion

FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

ROGER MARK SCOTT , No. 11-99002 Petitioner-Appellant, D.C. No. v. 2:97-cv-01554-PGR District of Arizona, CHARLES L. RYAN , Phoenix Respondent-Appellee. ORDER

Filed January 23, 2013

Before: Alex Kozinski, Chief Judge, Jerome Farris, and Carlos T. Bea, Circuit Judges.

ORDER

Our opinion, filed on August 1, 2012, is amended as follows: Footnote 1, at Slip Op. Page 8536, Lines 25–26, replace with

Appellant’s petition for panel rehearing and petition for rehearing en banc are denied. Fed. R. App. P. 35, 40. No future petitions for rehearing or petitions for rehearing en banc will be entertained.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Roger Scott v. Charles Ryan, (9th Cir. 2013).

Roger Scott v. Charles Ryan (Roger Scott v. Charles Ryan) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.