Roger R. Dawson and Velma L. Dawson v. Shenandoah Retreat Land Corporation, Etc.

Fourth Circuit

Roger R. Dawson and Velma L. Dawson v. Shenandoah Retreat Land Corporation, Etc.

422 F.2d 402, 1970 U.S. App. LEXIS 10055

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided March 31, 1970·No. 13946·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

In this appeal we find oral argument unnecessary and affirm the order of the district court dismissing the appellants’ complaint for failure to allege any basis for federal jurisdiction. Clearly there is no diversity jurisdiction, and to the extent that the complaint attempts to invoke subject matter jurisdiction, it is insufficient to state a claim on which relief can be granted.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

In this appeal we find oral argument unnecessary and affirm the order of the district court dismissing the appellants’ complaint for failure to allege any basis for federal jurisdiction. Clearly there is no diversity jurisdiction, and to the extent that the complaint attempts to invoke subject matter jurisdiction, it is insufficient to state a claim on which relief can be granted.

Affirmed.

Roger R. Dawson and Velma L. Dawson v. Shenandoah Retreat Land Corporation, Etc., 422 F.2d 402, 1970 U.S. App. LEXIS 10055 (4th Cir. 1970).

Pincite

422 F.2d 402 (Roger R. Dawson and Velma L. Dawson v. Shenandoah Retreat Land Corporation, Etc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.