Roger R. Dawson and Velma L. Dawson v. Shenandoah Retreat Land Corporation, Etc.

Fourth Circuit

Roger R. Dawson and Velma L. Dawson v. Shenandoah Retreat Land Corporation, Etc.

422 F.2d 402, 1970 U.S. App. LEXIS 10055

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

DecidedMarch 31, 1970

Docket13946

StatusPublished

This text of 422 F.2d 402 (Roger R. Dawson and Velma L. Dawson v. Shenandoah Retreat Land Corporation, Etc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Roger R. Dawson and Velma L. Dawson v. Shenandoah Retreat Land Corporation, Etc., 422 F.2d 402, 1970 U.S. App. LEXIS 10055 (4th Cir. 1970).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

In this appeal we find oral argument unnecessary and affirm the order of the district court dismissing the appellants’ complaint for failure to allege any basis for federal jurisdiction. Clearly there is no diversity jurisdiction, and to the extent that the complaint attempts to invoke subject matter jurisdiction, it is insufficient to state a claim on which relief can be granted.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

In this appeal we find oral argument unnecessary and affirm the order of the district court dismissing the appellants’ complaint for failure to allege any basis for federal jurisdiction. Clearly there is no diversity jurisdiction, and to the extent that the complaint attempts to invoke subject matter jurisdiction, it is insufficient to state a claim on which relief can be granted.

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

422 F.2d 402, 1970 U.S. App. LEXIS 10055, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/roger-r-dawson-and-velma-l-dawson-v-shenandoah-retreat-land-corporation-ca4-1970.