Home/Ninth Circuit/Roger Paul Smith v. George H. Baldwin

Roger Paul Smith v. George H. Baldwin

482 F.3d 1156, 2007 U.S. App. LEXIS 7983, 2007 WL 1031654
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
DecidedApril 6, 2007
Docket04-35253
StatusPublished

This text of 482 F.3d 1156 (Roger Paul Smith v. George H. Baldwin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Roger Paul Smith v. George H. Baldwin, 482 F.3d 1156, 2007 U.S. App. LEXIS 7983, 2007 WL 1031654 (9th Cir. 2007).

Opinion

ORDER

SCHROEDER, Chief Judge.

Upon the vote of a majority of nonre-cused regular active judges of this court, 1 it is ordered that this case be reheard by the en banc court pursuant to Circuit Rule 35-3. The three-judge panel opinion shall not be cited as precedent by or to this court or any district court of the Ninth Circuit, except to the extent adopted by the en banc court.

1

. Judge Graber is recused.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Animal Legal Defense Fund v. Veneman
482 F.3d 1156 (Ninth Circuit, 2007)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
482 F.3d 1156, 2007 U.S. App. LEXIS 7983, 2007 WL 1031654, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/roger-paul-smith-v-george-h-baldwin-ca9-2007.