Roger Nicklaw v. CitiMortgage, Inc.

855 F.3d 1265, 2017 WL 1548204, 2017 U.S. App. LEXIS 7716
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit·Decided May 1, 2017·No. 15-14216-FF·Published·Cited by 13 cases

Opinions

BY THE COURT:

A petition for rehearing having been filed and a member of this Court in active service having requested a poll on whether this case should be reheard by the Court sitting en banc, and a majority of the [1266]*1266judges in active service on this Court having voted against granting a rehearing en banc, it is ORDERED that this case will not be reheard en banc.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Roger Nicklaw v. CitiMortgage, Inc., 855 F.3d 1265, 2017 WL 1548204, 2017 U.S. App. LEXIS 7716 (11th Cir. 2017).

855 F.3d 1265 (Roger Nicklaw v. CitiMortgage, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Maddox v. Bank of N.Y. Mellon Tr. Co., N.A.
19 F.4th 58 (Second Circuit, 2021)
Maddox v. Bank of N.Y. Mellon Tr. Co.
997 F.3d 436 (Second Circuit, 2021)
Lenoir v. AHCA
S.D. Florida, 2020
Sebastian Cordoba v. DIRECTV, LLC
942 F.3d 1259 (Eleventh Circuit, 2019)
John Salcedo v. Alex Hanna
936 F.3d 1162 (Eleventh Circuit, 2019)
Taylor v. Fred's, Inc.
285 F. Supp. 3d 1247 (N.D. Alabama, 2018)
L.R.M. Ex Rel. McCracklin v. Social Security Administration
404 F. App'x 415 (Eleventh Circuit, 2010)