Roger M. Faulkner v. State of Maryland

904 F.2d 699, 1990 U.S. App. LEXIS 8574, 1990 WL 73889
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedMay 29, 1990
Docket89-6872
StatusUnpublished

This text of 904 F.2d 699 (Roger M. Faulkner v. State of Maryland) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Roger M. Faulkner v. State of Maryland, 904 F.2d 699, 1990 U.S. App. LEXIS 8574, 1990 WL 73889 (4th Cir. 1990).

Opinion

904 F.2d 699
Unpublished Disposition

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Roger M. FAULKNER, Petitioner-Appellant,
v.
STATE of MARYLAND, Respondent-Appellee.

No. 89-6872.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: March 28, 1990.
Decided: May 29, 1990.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Herbert F. Murray, Senior District Judge. (C/A No. 86-2794-HM).

Roger M. Faulkner, appellant pro se.

Mary Ellen Barbera, John Joseph Curran, Jr., Office of the Attorney General of Maryland, Baltimore, Md., for appellee.

D.Md.

DISMISSED.

Before PHILLIPS and K.K. HALL, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

Roger M. Faulkner seeks to appeal the district court's order refusing habeas corpus relief pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2254. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of probable cause to appeal and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Faulkner v. State of Maryland, CA-86-2794-HM (D.Md. Sept. 19, 1989). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Coffey (William H.) v. Pslj, Inc
904 F.2d 699 (Fourth Circuit, 1990)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
904 F.2d 699, 1990 U.S. App. LEXIS 8574, 1990 WL 73889, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/roger-m-faulkner-v-state-of-maryland-ca4-1990.