Roger Lopez v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Roger Lopez v. State

144 So. 3d 631, 2014 WL 3843193, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 12019

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedAugust 6, 2014

Docket4D10-5110

StatusPublished

This text of 144 So. 3d 631 (Roger Lopez v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Roger Lopez v. State, 144 So. 3d 631, 2014 WL 3843193, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 12019 (Fla. Ct. App. 2014).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

On Remand

This case is before the Court on remand from the Florida Supreme Court which quashed our decision in Lopez v. State, 84 So.3d 389 (Fla. 4th DCA 2012). Appellant entered his plea in this case on April 22, 2009. He did not appeal. His conviction became final on direct review on or about May 22, 2009.

Padilla v. Kentucky, 559 U.S. 356, 130 S.Ct. 1473, 176 L.Ed.2d 284 (2010), which issued on March 31, 2010, does not apply retroactively to convictions that were final on direct review at the time Padilla issued. Chaidez v. United States, — U.S. -, 133 S.Ct. 1103, 185 L.Ed.2d 149 (2013); Hernandez v. State, 124 So.3d 757 (Fla.2012).

Appellant filed this timely rule 3.850 motion seeking to withdraw his plea on June 2, 2010, after Padilla had been decided. We have held that Padilla does not apply retroactively in this situation. Perez v. State, 120 So.3d 49, 51 (Fla. 4th DCA 2013) (holding that Castaño v. State, 119 So.3d 1208 (Fla.2012), applies only where the postconviction claim was pending before the trial court when Padilla was decided).

Affirmed.

TAYLOR, GERBER and LEVINE, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI