Roger Lee Coffey v. Lonnie Saunders Jack Lee Sandra Murphy Sergeant Deola Officer McCallister

48 F.3d 1215, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 11009, 1995 WL 105299
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedMarch 14, 1995
Docket94-7200
StatusPublished

This text of 48 F.3d 1215 (Roger Lee Coffey v. Lonnie Saunders Jack Lee Sandra Murphy Sergeant Deola Officer McCallister) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Roger Lee Coffey v. Lonnie Saunders Jack Lee Sandra Murphy Sergeant Deola Officer McCallister, 48 F.3d 1215, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 11009, 1995 WL 105299 (4th Cir. 1995).

Opinion

48 F.3d 1215
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Roger Lee COFFEY, Plaintiff--Appellant,
v.
Lonnie SAUNDERS; Jack Lee; Sandra Murphy; Sergeant Deola;
Officer Mccallister, Defendants--Appellees.

No. 94-7200.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: Feb. 16, 1995
Decided: March 14, 1995

Roger Lee Coffey, Appellant Pro Se. Susan Campbell Alexander, Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, Va; Colin James Steuart Thomas, III, Timberlake, Smith, Thomas & Moses, P.C., Staunton, VA, for Appellees.

Before HAMILTON and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and CHAPMAN, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 (1988) complaint. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Coffey v. Saunders, No. CA-94-246-R (W.D.Va. Oct. 12, 1994). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
48 F.3d 1215, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 11009, 1995 WL 105299, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/roger-lee-coffey-v-lonnie-saunders-jack-lee-sandra-ca4-1995.