Roger L. Spurbeck v. Samuel L. Stallings, Attorney General of the State of North Carolina

842 F.2d 1292, 1988 U.S. App. LEXIS 3329, 1988 WL 24295
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedMarch 17, 1988
Docket87-6644
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 842 F.2d 1292 (Roger L. Spurbeck v. Samuel L. Stallings, Attorney General of the State of North Carolina) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Roger L. Spurbeck v. Samuel L. Stallings, Attorney General of the State of North Carolina, 842 F.2d 1292, 1988 U.S. App. LEXIS 3329, 1988 WL 24295 (4th Cir. 1988).

Opinion

842 F.2d 1292
Unpublished Disposition
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Roger L. SPURBECK, Petitioner-Appellant,
v.
Samuel L. STALLINGS, Attorney General of the State of North
Carolina, Respondents-Appellees.

87-6644.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

March 17, 1988.

Roger L. Spurbeck, appellant pro se.

Richard Norwood League, Office of Attorney General of North Carolina, for appellees.

Before MURNAGHAN, SPROUSE, and WILKINS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

A review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal from its order refusing habeas corpus relief pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2254 would be without merit. Additionally, we conclude that the district court did not abuse its discretion in denying Spurbeck's motion for relief from judgment brought pursuant to Rule 60(b), Fed.R.Civ.P. Spurbeck offered no reason under the rule requiring the district court to reconsider its judgment. Because the dispositive issues recently have been decided authoritatively, we deny a certificate of probable cause to appeal, dispense with oral argument, and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Spurbeck v. Stallings, C/A No. 86-1326-HC (E.D.N.C. July 20, 1987).

DISMISSED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
842 F.2d 1292, 1988 U.S. App. LEXIS 3329, 1988 WL 24295, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/roger-l-spurbeck-v-samuel-l-stallings-attorney-general-of-the-state-of-ca4-1988.