Roger L. Hall v. R. C. Marshall, Supt.

802 F.2d 457, 1986 U.S. App. LEXIS 28025, 1986 WL 17593
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
DecidedAugust 11, 1986
Docket86-3539
StatusUnpublished

This text of 802 F.2d 457 (Roger L. Hall v. R. C. Marshall, Supt.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Roger L. Hall v. R. C. Marshall, Supt., 802 F.2d 457, 1986 U.S. App. LEXIS 28025, 1986 WL 17593 (6th Cir. 1986).

Opinion

802 F.2d 457

Unpublished Disposition
NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Sixth Circuit.
ROGER L. HALL, Petitioner-Appellant
v.
R. C. MARSHALL, SUPT., Respondent-Appellee.

No. 86-3539.

United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.

Aug. 11, 1986.

BEFORE: JONES and MILBURN, Circuit Judges; and CONTIE, Senior Circuit Judge

ORDER

This matter is before the Court upon consideration of the appellant's response to this Court's June 30, 1986, order. Appellant has also filed a motion for appointment of counsel.

It appears from the record that the judgment was entered April 16, 1986. The notice of appeal filed on June 2, 1986, was 17 days late. Rules 4(a) and 26(a), Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure.

The failure of an appellant to timely file a notice of appeal deprives an appellate court of jurisdiction. Compliance with Rule 4(a), Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure, is a mandatory and jurisdictional prerequisite which this Court can neither waive nor extend. Peake v. First Nat'l Bank & Trust Co., 717 F.2d 1016 (6th Cir. 1983). Rule 26(b), Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure, specifically provides that this Court cannot enlarge the time for filing a notice of appeal.

Accordingly, it is ORDERED that this appeal be and it hereby is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. Rule 9(d)(1), Rules of the Sixth Circuit.

It is further ORDERED that the motion for counsel be and hereby is denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
802 F.2d 457, 1986 U.S. App. LEXIS 28025, 1986 WL 17593, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/roger-l-hall-v-r-c-marshall-supt-ca6-1986.