Roger Dale Stembridge v. the State of Texas
This text of Roger Dale Stembridge v. the State of Texas (Roger Dale Stembridge v. the State of Texas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In The Court of Appeals Seventh District of Texas at Amarillo
No. 07-23-00246-CR
ROGER DALE STEMBRIDGE, APPELLANT
V.
THE STATE OF TEXAS, APPELLEE
On Appeal from the 31st District Court Wheeler County, Texas Trial Court No. 5716, Honorable Steven R. Emmert, Presiding
August 17, 2023 MEMORANDUM OPINION Before QUINN, C.J., and DOSS and YARBROUGH, JJ.
On June 29, 2023, Appellant, Roger Dale Stembridge, filed a notice of appeal, pro
se, from the trial court’s interlocutory order permitting his appointed counsel to withdraw
and appointing new counsel. By letter of July 24, 2023, we notified Appellant that we did
not have jurisdiction over the interlocutory appeal and directed him to show grounds for
continuing the appeal by August 3. See Abbott v. State, 271 S.W.3d 694, 697–98 (Tex.
Crim. App. 2008) (explaining that appellate courts have jurisdiction in a criminal case to
consider an appeal from a judgment of guilt or where jurisdiction has been expressly granted by law); Webb v. State, No. 13-13-00075-CR, 2013 Tex. App. LEXIS 5082, at *3
(Tex. App.—Corpus Christi Apr. 25, 2013, no pet.) (per curiam) (mem. op., not designated
for publication) (finding no interlocutory appeal from an order permitting counsel to
withdraw). Appellant did not respond to our inquiry.
We have since been notified that on August 9, 2023, Appellant was convicted of
driving while intoxicated 1 and sentenced to six years’ confinement pursuant to a plea
bargain agreement. The trial court issued a certification of Appellant’s right of appeal
reflecting that this is a plea bargain case from which Appellant has no right of appeal.
The certification comports with the record before the Court.
Because we are required by Rule of Appellate Procedure 25.2(d) to dismiss an
appeal “if a certification that shows the defendant has the right of appeal has not been
made part of the record,” we dismiss the appeal based on the trial court’s certification.
See TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(d); Terrell v. State, 245 S.W.3d 602, 604-605 (Tex. App.—
Houston [1st Dist.] 2007, no pet.) (holding that the appellate court need not afford advance
notice of its intent to dismiss when the trial court certification reflects appellant has no
right to appeal).
The appeal is dismissed.
Per Curiam
Do not publish.
1 See TEX. PENAL CODE ANN. § 49.09(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Roger Dale Stembridge v. the State of Texas, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/roger-dale-stembridge-v-the-state-of-texas-texapp-2023.