Roger Dale Grubb v. L. Wayne Moore, Superintendent Attorney General of North Carolina

72 F.3d 126, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 39544, 1995 WL 739383
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedDecember 14, 1995
Docket95-6536
StatusPublished

This text of 72 F.3d 126 (Roger Dale Grubb v. L. Wayne Moore, Superintendent Attorney General of North Carolina) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Roger Dale Grubb v. L. Wayne Moore, Superintendent Attorney General of North Carolina, 72 F.3d 126, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 39544, 1995 WL 739383 (4th Cir. 1995).

Opinion

72 F.3d 126
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Roger Dale GRUBB, Petitioner-Appellant,
v.
L. Wayne MOORE, Superintendent; Attorney General of North
Carolina, Respondents-Appellees.

Nos. 95-6536, CA4.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted Nov. 14, 1995.
Decided Dec. 14, 1995.

Roger Dale Grubb, Appellant Pro Se. Richard Norwood League, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF NORTH CAROLINA, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellees.

Before LUTTIG, WILLIAMS, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2254 (1988) petition. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of probable cause to appeal and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Grubb v. Moore, No. CA-94-281-1 (M.D.N.C. Mar. 17, 1995). We deny the motion for oral argument and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. Leave to proceed in forma pauperis is denied.

DISMISSED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
72 F.3d 126, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 39544, 1995 WL 739383, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/roger-dale-grubb-v-l-wayne-moore-superintendent-at-ca4-1995.