Roger Curtis v. Meijer, Inc.

831 F.2d 294, 1987 U.S. App. LEXIS 13486, 1987 WL 44460
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit·Decided October 8, 1987·No. 86-1743·Unpublished

Opinion

831 F.2d 294

Unpublished Disposition
NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Sixth Circuit.
Roger CURTIS, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
MEIJER, INC., et al., Defendants-Appellees.

No. 86-1743

United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.

October 8, 1987.

BEFORE: BOYCE F. MARTIN, Jr. and DAVID A. NELSON, Circuit Judges, CONTIE, Senior Circuit Judge.

ORDER

This cause having come on to be heard upon the record, the briefs and the oral argument of the parties, and upon due consideration thereof,

The court finds that no prejudicial error intervened in the judgment and proceedings in the district court, and it is therefore ORDERED that said judgment be, and it hereby is, affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Roger Curtis v. Meijer, Inc., 831 F.2d 294, 1987 U.S. App. LEXIS 13486, 1987 WL 44460 (6th Cir. 1987).

831 F.2d 294 (Roger Curtis v. Meijer, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Hines (Norman E.) v. General Motors Corporation
831 F.2d 294 (Sixth Circuit, 1987)