Roger Cecil Perry, Jr. A/K/A Rodger Cecil Perry, Jr. v. State

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedDecember 6, 2012
Docket02-12-00416-CR
StatusPublished

This text of Roger Cecil Perry, Jr. A/K/A Rodger Cecil Perry, Jr. v. State (Roger Cecil Perry, Jr. A/K/A Rodger Cecil Perry, Jr. v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Roger Cecil Perry, Jr. A/K/A Rodger Cecil Perry, Jr. v. State, (Tex. Ct. App. 2012).

Opinion

COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH

NO. 02-12-00416-CR

Roger Cecil Perry, Jr. a/k/a Rodger § From the 371st District Court Cecil Perry, Jr. § of Tarrant County (0982309D)

v. § December 6, 2012

§ Per Curiam

The State of Texas § (nfp)

JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that

the appeal should be dismissed. It is ordered that the appeal is dismissed.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS

PER CURIAM COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH

ROGER CECIL PERRY, APPELLANT JR. A/K/A RODGER CECIL PERRY, JR.

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS STATE

------------

FROM THE 371ST DISTRICT COURT OF TARRANT COUNTY

MEMORANDUM OPINION1 ------------

Appellant Roger Cecil Perry, Jr. a/k/a Rodger Cecil Perry, Jr. attempts to

appeal from the trial court’s judgment adjudicating his guilt of aggravated robbery

with a deadly weapon and sentencing him to eight years’ confinement pursuant

to a plea agreement. The trial court’s certification of his right to appeal states

that this “is a plea-bargain case, and the defendant has NO right of appeal.”

1 See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4.

2 On September 7, 2012, this court notified appellant about the statement on

the trial court’s certification and informed him that unless he or any party desiring

to continue to the appeal filed with the court, on or before September 17, 2012, a

response showing grounds for continuing the appeal, the appeal could be

dismissed. See Tex. R. App. P. 25.2(d), 44.3. We have received no response.

Therefore, we dismiss the appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 25.2(d), 43.2(f).

PER CURIAM

PANEL: MCCOY, MEIER, and GABRIEL, JJ.

DO NOT PUBLISH Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b)

DELIVERED: December 6, 2012

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Roger Cecil Perry, Jr. A/K/A Rodger Cecil Perry, Jr. v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/roger-cecil-perry-jr-aka-rodger-cecil-perry-jr-v-s-texapp-2012.